Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-BigFish: VP Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:50:02 -0700 From: Isaac Foraker Subject: Re: Bug: link.exe In-reply-to: <20041229072512.GB21682@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <41DAC93A.6060504@xilinx.com> Organization: Xilinx, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) References: <41C9ED30 DOT 6000709 AT xilinx DOT com> <20041223093516 DOT GB317 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <41D24B6D DOT 8060505 AT xilinx DOT com> <20041229072512 DOT GB21682 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes That's a really nice attitude. I don't expect anyone to bend over backwards, but a little QC would be nice. If you would prefer that professionals using Cygwin with commercial configurations do not provide feedback, I suggest you update the fact and just say so. IF Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:15:09PM -0700, Isaac Foraker wrote: > > >>Well, rather than hacking my build system, I've opted to build my own >>installer for Cygwin the does not contain programs that are causing me >>grief. I know that some people don't want to hear that we use MS VC++ >>with Cygwin, but hey, this is the real world here. Cygwin helps our >>productivity, and the other is just a requirement of the job. >> >> > >I think it is safe to say that no one really cares if you are using >MSDEV or not. We're just not going to bend over backwards to make MSDEV >integrate by changing the distribution. > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/