Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:09:45 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: check_case:adjust still an option?
Message-ID: <20050103110945.GE12820@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20050102203221 DOT GB344 AT efn DOT org> <20050102213301 DOT GA552397 AT hpn5170> <20050102221844 DOT GA608 AT efn DOT org> <20050102231344 DOT GA35436409 AT hpn5170> <20050103011210 DOT GA2112 AT efn DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501022019400 DOT 2820 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0501022019400.2820@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Jan  2 20:21, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > Seems kind of pointless, really.
> 
> It is pointless.  As I understood the documentation previously, it's the
> POSIX path that should have been adjusted.  As is, though, it's useless.
> FWIW, I have nothing against removing the check_case:adjust logic, as long
> as the check_case:strict one is left in-place.  Unfortunately, most of the
> check_case logic is associated with check_case:strict.

I'd rather see check_case go away entirely since it's pointless entirely.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/