Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:32:15 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin package management Message-ID: <20041227163215.GG23393@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200412271301 DOT iBRD1kl10849 AT esds DOT vss DOT fsi DOT com> <41D01F3F DOT 40801 AT luc DOT ac DOT be> <41D022C0 DOT 70508 AT luc DOT ac DOT be> <87oegfpx91 DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041227104154 DOT 04bd4900 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <87d5wvpvvi DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <41D0341A DOT 3030709 AT luc DOT ac DOT be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D0341A.3030709@luc.ac.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:11:06PM +0100, Michel Van den Bergh wrote: >>Of course. Otoh, providing a unix environment and then expecting >>people to resistancelessly accept a setup.exe gui to do package >>management is asking for trouble ;-) > >I second that! As usual, it seems that a point was missed. "Seconding" doesn't do anything here. If you want to add a command-line package management tool to cygwin nothing is stopping you. Propose it like a normal package. I would insist that anyone who does this vows to stick around for the support problems that is sure to follow however. I even wrote one of these myself but then quailed at the thought of scores of "it not work, i need install cygwin, u fix?" email that would be sure to follow if I actually formally introduced it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/