Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:43:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How change libtool rule of naming dlls from "cygFOO-version.dll" to "FOO.dll"? Message-ID: <20041223064317.GA13179@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <0C7AD907113E984F9C2AF0B651D0D3DE07BC19 AT exmid04 DOT africa DOT enterprise DOT root> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0C7AD907113E984F9C2AF0B651D0D3DE07BC19@exmid04.africa.enterprise.root> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:23:37AM +0200, Mike Kenny - BCX - Professional Services JHB wrote: >> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com >> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor >> >> Even if it was "ln -s", it's hardly fair to blame windows for >> not honoring a cygwin invention -- symbolic links. > >My intent was not to blame windows for not honoring a cygwin(?) >invention, but for not having such useful functionality itself. > >IIRC symbolic links predate cygwin, even predate linux for that >matter. No way? You mean cygwin didn't invent symbolic links?!? Who would ever have guessed! >In fact they predate windows as we know it today so it is surprising >that as so many other good ideas from UNIX made it into MS products >that links didn't. Hard or soft. That was my point. So now your point is instructing people in basic UNIX 101? You should probably quit while you're not too far behind. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/