Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Tetex-2.0.2-13: texdoc bug/suggestion References: <873by0alo5 DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Organization: Jan at Appel Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:04:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Igor Pechtchanski's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:54 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87ekhjiqmw.fsf@peder.flower> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski writes: > AFAIK, there's no "see" under Cygwin. It would probably be best to use > cygstart in any case. FWIW, the same goes for both _pdf and _ps. Ok. > BTW, why not patch texdoc? Because that's not the right fix? There's no platform specific code in texdoc, so upstream won't take a Cygwin specfic patch. The right fix seems to be adding /usr/bin/see that executes cygstart? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/