Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20041215193920.04854748@pop.prospeed.net> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:40:34 -0500 To: Adam McKee , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: c++ code executes very slowly - sjlj EH to blame? In-Reply-To: <20041215222324.90803.qmail@web52509.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041215222324 DOT 90803 DOT qmail AT web52509 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 05:23 PM 12/15/2004, you wrote: >My app runs about 6 times faster on linux than cygwin, >even though it spends the bulk of its time doing pure >computation in user-space: strace shows a minimum of >system calls being made. Profiling shows that the >culprit could be sjlj (set-jump/long-jump) EH. > >After googling around a bit, I found that other folks >seem to have had a similar experience... > >http://www.google.ca/search?q=sjlj+cygwin+octave&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial > >Does anyone know how to build a gcc/g++ that use >DWARF2 EH, instead of ... what we might call "abort()" >EH? I would very much like to try this out - to see >if it will bring performance of my app on cygwin out >of the toilet. > >Also - is it likely that cygwin will move away from >sjlj EH soon? I'll let googling answer this question for you too. :-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/