Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <038e01c4e1f7$39208220$5308a8c0@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Daniel Jensen" <jensend AT iname DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <41BF0D1E DOT 4060509 AT iname DOT com>
Subject: Re: patchutils 0.2.30-1
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:08:31 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Daniel Jensen wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why patchutils 0.2.30-1 is marked as
> experimental?

It's not. It's actually erroneously marked as prev, due to me not realizing 
how upset would order the version numbers without assistance.

Fixed now.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/