Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:25:37 -0800 From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros Message-ID: <20041208212256.GB2148@efn.org> References: <20041206231117 DOT GA18146 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: bs"d X-IsSubscribed: yes On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:40:59PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote: > > >The following was rejected on cygwin-patches. I'm intentionally posting > > >to the wrong list now because I shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing > > >list just to report a bug! > > > > Since cygwin-patches isn't a "bug reporting" mailing list and since the below > > isn't "a patch", > > It's a line by line description of what needs to be changed to fix a > bug. That it's not a "Larry Wall format" patch doesn't make it any > less of a patch. Is there a reason? Applying a patch shouldn't have involve starting an editor. > The mailing list description page says not to mail such things to this > list. > > > I'd say that that the system was working as designed. > > Hardly. Umm, you need to distinguish between reporting a bug (which should be done here) and submitting a patch (which should be done on cygwin-patches). Requiring subscription probably filters out a lot of stuff that shouldn't be on that list, and is a reasonable request. Is there a reason you couldn't subscribe, send, and unsubscribe? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/