Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Sharkey <sharkey AT netrics DOT com>
X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy
Subject: Re: w32api usr/include/sqlext.h bad macros
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:11:17 EST." <20041206231117.GA18146@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:40:59 -0500
Message-Id: <E1CbULb-00068A-00@mastermind.netrics.internal>

> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Eric Sharkey wrote:
> >The following was rejected on cygwin-patches.  I'm intentionally posting
> >to the wrong list now because I shouldn't have to subscribe to a mailing
> >list just to report a bug!
> 
> Since cygwin-patches isn't a "bug reporting" mailing list and since the below
> isn't "a patch",

It's a line by line description of what needs to be changed to fix a
bug.  That it's not a "Larry Wall format" patch doesn't make it any
less of a patch.

The mailing list description page says not to mail such things to this
list.

> I'd say that that the system was working as designed.

Hardly.

Eric

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/