Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <41AF25AE.8020809@merl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 09:24:46 -0500
From: David Rudolph <rudolph AT merl DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin and Dragon NaturallySpeaking
References: <NUTMEGQO3OhV84dqBHk0000030c AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGQO3OhV84dqBHk0000030c@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (cambridge.merl.com: domain of rudolph AT merl DOT com designates 137.203.134.9 as permitted sender)

Dave Korn wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David Rudolph
>>Sent: 01 December 2004 19:52
> 
> 
>>I have been using Cygwin and Dragon NaturallySpeaking 7 
>>(independantly, but on the same system) for a long time. 
>>I recently upgraded Dragon to version 8, and now 
> 
> 
>   Is dragon a cygwin-based application that bundles its own version of the
> dll, perhaps?  (http://cygwin.com/acronyms#3PP)
> 
> 

No, it's a commercial Windows app.


>>any Cygwin app (or maybe it's any app that uses the 
>>cygwin DLL) 
> 
> 
>   Those two are exactly one and the same thing!
> 
> 
>>that hangs around for a while (such as the X server or ssh) 
>>uses 30-40% of the CPU when it appears to be idle. This only happens 
>>after Dragon has been started. I have updated Cygwin as of 
>>11/30. Anyone have any idea what could be going on?
> 
> 
>   Seems like Dragon is b0rking cygwin.  It must be faulty.  You should raise
> a support issue with Dragon.


Of course I did, and of course they said it must be Cygwin's fault, if 
it's taking up the CPU time. Just thought I'd check whether anyone else 
has seen this.

Dave

-- 

David Rudolph
dcrudolph AT ieee DOT org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/