Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <41AE1451.1060006@x-ray.at> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:58:25 +0100 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Hinds CC: Cygwin List Subject: Re: A vexing installation problem References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129135305 DOT 046bca10 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129195946 DOT GA4932 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129151309 DOT 046bfba0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129215220 DOT GA15085 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129171109 DOT 046d1728 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129231740 DOT GA32760 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129181904 DOT 046bf960 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041130011421 DOT GA20359 AT sonic DOT net> <20041130170757 DOT GA3861 AT sonic DOT net> <20041130192952 DOT GA2722 AT sonic DOT net> <20041201184434 DOT GA7909 AT sonic DOT net> In-Reply-To: <20041201184434.GA7909@sonic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes David Hinds schrieb: > Drat... Windows Update decided to install a "critical security fix" > last night, and today, Cygwin appears to be 100% dead in the water as > opposed to yesterday's 90%. The security fix is supposed to be in > Internet Explorer so it might just be a coincidence. > > I've attached "strace" output from running "ls". The output is > slightly different from previous attempts, because I'd been able to > run the postinstall scripts to populate /etc/passwd and /etc/group; > but the failure mode appears unchanged, with death following shortly > after signals are enabled. The trace is still slightly variable from > one run to the next; sometimes I get one or two messages about locks, > sometimes not. > > By the way, this is a dual Xeon workstation, without hyperthreading. ... > 218 22778 [main] ls 1336 path_conv::check: this->path(\\duckling\dhinds), has_acls(0) > 158 22936 [main] ls 1336 win_env::add_cache: posix //duckling/dhinds > 149 23085 [main] ls 1336 win_env::add_cache: native HOME=\\duckling\dhinds > 641 23726 [main] ls 1336 sigproc_init: process/signal handling enabled(1001) > 203 23929 [main] ls 1336 __cygwin_lock_lock: threadcount 1. not locking And you really think using a UNC path $HOME is a good idea? And you really think you must send us this strace just for telling us that cygwin didn't like your UNC path $HOME? How about mounting this to a local volume ("net use * \\duckling\dhinds" or cygwin's mount) Or better use a local drive for home instead? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/