Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:54:04 -0800
From: David Hinds <dhinds AT sonic DOT net>
To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: A vexing installation problem
Message-ID: <20041201185404.GA10032@sonic.net>
References: <20041129195946 DOT GA4932 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129151309 DOT 046bfba0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129215220 DOT GA15085 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129171109 DOT 046d1728 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129231740 DOT GA32760 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129181904 DOT 046bf960 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041130011421 DOT GA20359 AT sonic DOT net> <20041130170757 DOT GA3861 AT sonic DOT net> <20041130192952 DOT GA2722 AT sonic DOT net> <20041201184434 DOT GA7909 AT sonic DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041201184434.GA7909@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:44:34AM -0800, David Hinds wrote:
> Drat... Windows Update decided to install a "critical security fix"
> last night, and today, Cygwin appears to be 100% dead in the water as
> opposed to yesterday's 90%.  The security fix is supposed to be in
> Internet Explorer so it might just be a coincidence.

I think it was just a coincidence.  The rate of success does seem
lower now, but I can't do an objective comparison.

-- Dave

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/