Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:17:40 -0800 From: David Hinds To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: A vexing installation problem Message-ID: <20041129231740.GA32760@sonic.net> References: <20041129071451 DOT GA15469 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129115158 DOT 046c9120 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129184442 DOT GA30302 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129135305 DOT 046bca10 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129195946 DOT GA4932 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129151309 DOT 046bfba0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041129215220 DOT GA15085 AT sonic DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041129171109 DOT 046d1728 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20041129171109.046d1728@pop.prospeed.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 05:22:28PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: > > > >File permissions appear ok as far as I can tell. The 'strace' output > >seems consistent with no permission problems; I'm able to execute all > >commands, cygwin1.dll is found, and things run for a short while > >before dying. > > But with no output, right? No dump file, nothing? Correct. > >'strace sh.exe' looks like any other command I try: > > > > ... > > 564 105230 [main] bash 3892 cygheap_user::ontherange: what 2, pw 0xA0510C8 > > 224 105454 [main] bash 3892 cygheap_user::ontherange: HOME is already in the environment /cygdrive/h > > 756 106210 [main] bash 3892 sigproc_init: process/signal handling enabled(1001) > > 365 106575 [main] bash 3892 __cygwin_lock_lock: threadcount 1. not locking > > 304 106879 [main] bash 3892 __cygwin_lock_unlock: threadcount 1. not unlocking > > > This isn't the strace of 'sh.exe'. It's the strace of 'bash.exe'. Can > you try 'sh.exe' and see if it's different. FWIW, the lines you provided > above I can find in my strace of 'bash.exe'. Mine goes on however. You're right. The output for 'sh.exe' is identical to 'bash.exe' with 'sh' substituted for 'bash'. > If you have 1.5.5 now that works for you, you can use that to bootstrap > your build and get a debug version of the current DLL to look at and > debug into. That might be your best bet. You can definitely get more > context that way, if you're so inclined. I do not have a fully functional 1.5.5 installation; all I could find was a tarball that includes a few commands (ps, kill, regtool, dumper, mount/umount, setfacl/getfacl, passwd, mkpasswd, mkgroup, cygpath, and cygcheck). The combination of unavailability of old distributions, and unavailability of a debug version of the current DLL, is kind of a pisser. I've got another system on my desk (also XP SP2) with the latest Cygwin that works fine. That system has a clean OS install; the one with problems has been upgraded over several years by Windows Update. I can try to build a debug DLL on that system but had hoped for a quicker diagnosis. -- Dave -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/