Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:12:47 -0800 From: Roger Pryor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Newbie question regarding tcsetattr Message-Id: <20041122071247.4fbbe9e3.rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com> In-Reply-To: <20041119131523.58dd206d.rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com> References: <20041119131523 DOT 58dd206d DOT rpryor AT pryor-and-pryor DOT com> Organization: Pryor and Pryor Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Declude-Sender: rpryor AT pryor-and-pryor DOT com [64.114.151.101] X-Declude-Spoolname: D03a8000701063d9d.SMD X-IsSubscribed: yes On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:15:23 -0800 Roger Pryor wrote: > Hi: > > I'm a new cygwin user, attepting to port a Linux package that uses the > COM ports to drive a remote device. I'm finding that calls to tcsetattr > don't seem to work. What is happening is that although the speed is > being setup correctly, the values that I want for c_iflag and c_cflag are > not being set, but left as they were before. Is this a known bug (there > were conversations about this last year in the archives) and if so is > there any idea when it will be fixed?, or am I confused (equally likely!) This seems to have dropped into a black hole, does anyone know what is the status of tcsetattr w.r.t serial ports? Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Pryor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/