Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <41A086F3.5030605@x-ray.at>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:15:47 +0100
From: Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bugs in autotools wrapper scripts
References: <419F9721 DOT 5000808 AT byu DOT net> <419FA88B DOT 2010006 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To: <419FA88B.2010006@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Charles Wilson schrieb:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> The autotools wrappers (automake 1.7.9-1, autoconf 2.59-1, and libtool
>> 1.5b-1) all have argument parsing bugs.  They are trying to parse every
>> option known to either <autotool>-stable or <autotool>-devel, but fail in
>> several respects.

> I've been thinking for a long time of ditching the current wrappers and 
> using something more like the linux distros do -- and sacrificing the 
> <stdin> behavior, just like they do.
> 
> So here's the question: does anybody actually USE <stdin> with the 
> autotools?  Does ANYBODY do '<some prog that generates a configure.ac on 
> stdout> | autoconf' ?

nope. never saw such a usage so far.

but I use a better wrapper which doesn't seperate into stable/devel.
I seperate into the wanted versions for aclocal/automake/libtool. 
autoconf is ok the current way.

   aclocal-1.7, aclocal-1.8, aclocal-1.9
   aclocal-lt-1.5.10, aclocal-lt-1.5.6, aclocal-1.9d (libtool versions)
   automake-1.8, automake-1.9
   libtool-1.5.6, libtool-1.5.10, libtool-1.9d

older versions not yet. (automake-1.4, automake-1.7.9, aclocal-1.4)

but this is just a private hack and not for general consumption.

> Depending on the response to my question above, I'll probably adopt 
> something like this ... but we'll have a fairly long probationary period 
> where the wrappers are in 'test' status, regardless.
> 
>> If this approach is not considered satisfactory, and you really want to
>> maintain the wrappers to know all options of the underlying tool, I 
>> can also
>> prepare patches for that approach that know how to split multiple short
>> options and how to rearrange arguments.
> 
> 
> Let's wait and see what develops on the "Do you use <stdin> + autotools" 
> question.  And thanks for your interest and pro-activeness.  THIS is 
> what opensource development should be like.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/