Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:31:42 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: flex and dos source files. How is flex built for cygwin Message-ID: <20041120193142.GD2765@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <419E499B DOT 4040007 AT mvista DOT com> <6 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20041119143038 DOT 04e7a008 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <419E52C1 DOT 6030604 AT mvista DOT com> <419E5922 DOT 9060501 AT mvista DOT com> <419EFB39 DOT 8020005 AT x-ray DOT at> <29A01F5A-3B11-11D9-84CE-000D932D0448 AT rehley DOT net> <419F8AA5 DOT 9040009 AT x-ray DOT at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <419F8AA5.9040009@x-ray.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 07:19:17PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: >so cgf should repackage it. it's obviously a bug. From the description of the behavior of the released flex binary, it sounds like it is working just fine. If you are saying that I should repackage the source files because you couldn't that the package was linked with automode.o then, that's something which is very far down on my list of priorities. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/