Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: MISTAKE IN PREVIOUS MESSAGE: gnumeric in cygwin ports of Gnome1.4 and Gnome2.x Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:16:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2004 19:16:40.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C3A5E60:01C4CE6C] > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Bob Clark > Sent: 19 November 2004 19:15 [snippo] > I have been trying to get gnumeric et al. back up and running during all > my free time for the last three days and I guess everything is just > running together. Sorry for the confusion. Sleep-deprivation starting to cause keyboard errors, huh? We all been there! :) Without having _any_ personal experience of gnumeric (or even gnome, to speak of), my best educated guess would be that your best shot would be to get yourself a proper, fresh and correctly running install of all the Gnome 2 stuff (don't forget the -devel packages if there are any) and then try really hard to get gnumeric built from source. It needs to be recompiled; it's not just a matter of forging the dll names, because functions and behaviours will probably have changed between gnome 1 and gnome 2. I don't know if they're supposed to be binary-compatible, but it wouldn't surprise me to hear that apps need to be recompiled with all the new header files and libraries. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/