Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Schaible <joerg DOT schaible AT gmx DOT de> Subject: Re: scp exits often with -1 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:57:15 +0100 Lines: 40 Message-ID: <cniuqr$534$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <F0D7281DAB048B438E8F5EC4ECEFBDDC506BE6 AT esmail DOT elsag DOT de> <20041118155449 DOT GG10795 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Reply-To: joerg DOT schaible AT gmx DOT de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9eb8f53.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: KNode/0.8.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:15:49AM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote: [snip] >>Well, this *is* the list for reporting problems with Cygwin. Sorry, >>that I missed among all the other 450 mail per month, the one Chris >>stated, that he don't want straces sent to list without further asking. > > My reason for stating this is that the majority of people who send strace > output snip the wrong part. Often people snip something that they think > shows a problem and send that lines and the next hundred lines. It turns > out to be wasted bandwidth. That's the reason, why I just sent the first part, where the initialization of all the pipes and forked processes can be seen and the last part, when scp is shutting down the processes again. I think the middle part, observing scp looking into the private keys and sending the file, is quite useless for this problem. > strace is a tool for people who are willing to look at source code. > Sending megabytes of an unsolicited strace before someone has indicated > that they are willing to help is usually pointless. Yeah, understand that. > FWIW, I ran scp in a loop sending a large file to a system on my local > network and to sourceware.org for hours a couple of days ago without > problems. Since I call from Java always "strace -o /tmp/scp.strace scp" I don't have the problem also. It's slow, but works. Too weird :( At least I could reproduce it without Java also. FWIW. > If this is a problem with the new pipe code then maybe Bob Byrnes could > offer some insight. As said, I'll take any further action to isolate it. Would you expect a difference using the current snapshot? - J�rg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/