Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <41964A90.4040508@x-ray.at> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:55:28 +0100 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new cygwin has memory problems? References: <20041112161531 DOT GA2612 AT ingber DOT com> <4194E7BB DOT 5030003 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20041112164817 DOT GM26737 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4194EB98 DOT 7070907 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20041112171759 DOT GB28402 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4195F8E7 DOT 9010206 AT x-ray DOT at> <20041113173832 DOT GE7554 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20041113173832.GE7554@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Christopher Faylor schrieb: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:07:03PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: > >>Christopher Faylor schrieb: >> >>>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:58:00PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> >>>>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Hey cool, you have top? >>>>>> >>>>>>$ top >>>>>>bash: top: command not found >>>>>> >>>>>>Where can I get it? >>>>> >>>>>http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=procps%2Fprocps-010801-2&grep=top%5C.exe >>>> >>>>I really need to install this package, thanks. >>> >>>Just to fruitlessly stifle the next question from anyone else who >>>has just found out about this package: >>> >>>No, there is no way to make top or procps display non-cygwin processes. >> >>For everything there's a way. The question is if it's worth the effort. >> >>For example I'm now seriously considering exporting a procfs to native >>windows, just to play with installable filesystems. > > I didn't say it was impossible. It's not even hard. It just doesn't > work now. > >>To improve mount and to get cygwin better talk to colinux. > > I don't think we want to add any colinux features to cygwin. Maybe > Corinna will disagree but I don't see any reason to add one byte of > extra code to cygwin to handle colinux. thanks. block devices have been already fixed in cygwin, so there's no need. colinux was just an example. of course the colinux console has to be enhanced to work better, which could be done by using some cygwin features. but in the context of mount if would make sense, if it wouldn't slow down startup time too much. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/