Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:38:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new cygwin has memory problems? Message-ID: <20041113173832.GE7554@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20041112161531 DOT GA2612 AT ingber DOT com> <4194E7BB DOT 5030003 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20041112164817 DOT GM26737 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4194EB98 DOT 7070907 AT familiehaase DOT de> <20041112171759 DOT GB28402 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4195F8E7 DOT 9010206 AT x-ray DOT at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4195F8E7.9010206@x-ray.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:07:03PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:58:00PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>>>Hey cool, you have top? >>>>> >>>>>$ top >>>>>bash: top: command not found >>>>> >>>>>Where can I get it? >>>> >>>>http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=procps%2Fprocps-010801-2&grep=top%5C.exe >>> >>>I really need to install this package, thanks. >> >>Just to fruitlessly stifle the next question from anyone else who >>has just found out about this package: >> >>No, there is no way to make top or procps display non-cygwin processes. > >For everything there's a way. The question is if it's worth the effort. > >For example I'm now seriously considering exporting a procfs to native >windows, just to play with installable filesystems. I didn't say it was impossible. It's not even hard. It just doesn't work now. >To improve mount and to get cygwin better talk to colinux. I don't think we want to add any colinux features to cygwin. Maybe Corinna will disagree but I don't see any reason to add one byte of extra code to cygwin to handle colinux. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/