Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: ls /dev/* Mail-Copies-To: never Reply-To: sds AT gnu DOT org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. From: Sam Steingold In-Reply-To: (Andrew DeFaria's message of "Tue, 02 Nov 2004 22:07:41 -0800") References: <20041102200113 DOT GA22769 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Andrew DeFaria Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:52:13 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain > * Andrew DeFaria [2004-11-02 22:07:41 -0800]: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:55:39PM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote: >> >>> why isn't /dev a more "usual" directory? >>> cd /dev, ls /dev all fail, while >>> cat /dev/clipboard works. >> >> No one has implemented the special handling required for /dev which >> would enable things like opendir/readdir or cd to work. > > Actually I change the cygdrive prefix to dev. Just seems to make sense > to me that C: would be /dev/c as apposed to /cygdrive/c, which is longer > to type. When I ls /dev I get: > > $ ls /dev > c/ d/ z/ YES! I think this is a great idea! -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k Every day above ground is a good day. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/