Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ls /dev/* Mail-Copies-To: never Reply-To: sds AT gnu DOT org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. From: Sam Steingold In-Reply-To: <20041102200113.GA22769@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:01:13 -0500") References: <20041102200113 DOT GA22769 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:44:45 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain > * Christopher Faylor [2004-11-02 15:01:13 -0500]: > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:55:39PM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote: >>why isn't /dev a more "usual" directory? >>cd /dev, ls /dev all fail, while >>cat /dev/clipboard works. > > No one has implemented the special handling required for /dev which > would enable things like opendir/readdir or cd to work. Thanks, I guessed that much. I also know about "PTC". (fhandler_proc.cc is too long, I guess fhandler_dev.cc would be just as long, and I suspect that fhandler_dev.cc is not the only this missing). Is this on anyone's TODO list? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k usually: can't pay ==> don't buy. software: can't buy ==> don't pay -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/