Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <012f01c4c023$1fe29d70$e6ec6f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Reini Urban" , "Cygwin" References: <000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da AT DANNY> <4185480F DOT 3080807 AT familiehaase DOT de> <000801c4bfbe$40351a90$3a4861cb AT DANNY> <4185CEBD DOT 2040601 AT x-ray DOT at> Subject: Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series. Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:57:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Reini Urban wrote: > Max, > Do we use some win32 callbacks with exceptions in setup.exe? > I do see some candidates, but I didn't follow the codepath exactly. We definitely use exceptions within non-main threads, which are callbacks of a kind, I suppose. I'd have to go look to see if we have any exceptions within window procedures. It would be really useful to know whether it is safe to throw an exception within a callback, provided it is caught before the callback returns. Does anyone know of anyone who might be able to answer that? Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/