Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4185480F.3080807@familiehaase.de> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:16:15 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-AT; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Smith CC: Cygwin , waterthrill AT yahoo DOT no Subject: Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series. References: <000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da AT DANNY> In-Reply-To: <000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da@DANNY> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Danny Smith wrote: > Gerrit wrote: > > >>Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: > > >>>Hi, >>> >>>I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the >>>performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. >>>The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it >>>with gcc-3.2.x instead. > > >>It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th. >>about it to resolve this issue then. > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563 Wow, this is an interesting story about exception handling. What I'm asking myself now: Should we try again to use dwarf2 exceptions? Should we try to find the reason why SjLj exceptions are slower on Cygwin than for the rest of the world? Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/