Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 07:46:31 +1300
From: Danny Smith <dannysmith AT clear DOT net DOT nz>
Subject: : Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.
To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: waterthrill AT yahoo DOT no
Reply-to: Danny Smith <dannysmith AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Message-id: <000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da@DANNY>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Gerrit wrote:

> Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the
>> performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. 
>> The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it
>> with gcc-3.2.x instead.

> It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th.
> about it to resolve this issue then.

 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563

Danny 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/