Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-2 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:05:03 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Morche Matthias" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2004 14:05:04.0149 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F4FE450:01C4BCF7] X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i9SE5ctr008215 Is the expected behaviour of clamscan to avoid scanning the root directory as shown below? $ clamscan -v -r / ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 25864 Scanned directories: 1 Scanned files: 0 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 0.00 MB I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes Time: 0.940 sec (0 m 0 s) A "clamscan -r /*" does a scan through at least some subdirectories! matthias ... > I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-2. ... > Note: There seem to be some bugs with clamd, which Mark Pizzolato is > investigating. Stopping and restarting the daemon is problematic for > sure. The non-daemon versions do work fine. ... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/