Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <417EFC7A.3010401@x-ray.at> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:40:10 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Pizzolato CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-1 References: <001101c4bbb6$f53dda50$153ca8c0 AT AlohaSunset DOT com> In-Reply-To: <001101c4bbb6$f53dda50$153ca8c0@AlohaSunset.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Mark Pizzolato schrieb: >> I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-1. >> This has now a shared version of the library and several updates. >> >> Clam AntiVirus - GPL anti-virus toolkit >> This distribution was built without the Windows UI. >> You might want to use clamavwin (python wxWindows) instead. >> See /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/clamav-0.80-1.README > > > I'm trying to track down a potential bug in either clamav or cygwin > which appears while running clamd. In order to find what and ehere I > tried to install the source package for this release of clamav to do > some debugging. > > There seems to be a bug in the source package for this updated clamav > release.. > > This becomes obvious when invoking the clamav-0-80-1.sh script with the > argument prep or all. > > The source package has a patch file named clamv-0.80-1.patch. While > this patch is being applied, the patches to the first few files goes OK, > while the remaining patches seem to be 1) reverse patches and 2) done > with a diff specifying one directory level too deep. So, I edit the > patch file, globally replacing /clamav-0.80/ with /. don't do this! these are leftovers from mkpatch > After doing this, > things get furthur, but as I mentioned there seems to be a reverse patch > going on, so patch prompts to "Assume -R" for several files, but not all > of the patches can be applied anyway. Then things go on to get worse. > This should probably be addressed by someone who created the patches in > the package. I see. Thanks! patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/README patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/preremove.sh patching file clamav-0.80/INSTALL patching file clamav-0.80/Makefile.in patching file clamav-0.80/acinclude.m4 patching file clamav-0.80/aclocal.m4 The next patch would delete the file clamav-0.80/clamav-0.80/AUTHORS, which does not exist! Assume -R? [n] ... These are wrong leftovers from the mkpatch step. Please replace in prep patch -b -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} ;\ with patch -N -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} ;\ This will safely ignore those wrong patches. That's why it was so huge! Sorry. I will come up with an update soon. I've found some problem by myself also and was already working on -2. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/