Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <030301c4b881$10d62c60$e6ec6f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Reini Urban" Cc: References: <028401c4b86b$b4cb72a0$e6ec6f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <41796DFB DOT 70300 AT x-ray DOT at> Subject: Re: Cygwin SWIG package - who is using it, and for what? Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:49:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Reini Urban wrote: > Max Bowsher schrieb: >> I took over as packager of SWIG for Cygwin a while ago, and am now >> getting ready to produce a new package. >> >> SWIG seems to make incompatible changes with depressing frequency, so >> decisions on when to package a new version need to be made with much >> greater deliberation then other packages - to that end, I'd to get an >> idea of how much the current swig package is being used, and for what. > > libming: for python and tcl > not yet swig'ified (manual updates): java, php, perl, ruby. Ok, I had a look at the source (though the tarball that I looked at seemed somewhat broken in the build system). This swig binding seems to be just one module - rather than a set of interacting modules. It is the support for multiple interacting modules which is in turmoil, so I'm hoping ming will work fine with more recent swig. Do you have a cygwin package of ming that I could test a proposed new cygwin swig package against? Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/