Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4175AA17.3010703@barnlea.com> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:58:15 -0500 From: Julian Opificius User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: unable to edit/less dotted files, etc. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Thanks for the reply, Dave, Turns out 1.3 is just the version of the doc file, I'm up to date. Sorry to give bum info. c:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll is dated 9/4/2004. I've just run a default install again, just in case. I haven't done anything with perms. I installed cygwin as administrator, not "just for me". The behavior is the same, whether I log in using the Win2k admin account or as my regular user account. I've just repeated the process: I can't edit a dotted file, even though I can "ls" it, and I can't edit files that don't conform to 8.3. If I rename files to 8.3, I can edit them. SO I don't think it has anything to do with permissions. Thanks for your continued help. julian. ============================= Dave Korn wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Julian Opificius >>Sent: 19 October 2004 17:49 > > >>I'm running v1.3 of Cygwin on Win2k on a laptop. > > > That is _years_ out of date. > > >>after the initial install, only later. I can list them with >>ls -al, but >>"vi .bashrc" opens up a new file, and less returns "No such file or >>directory". The files are accessible under Win2k, and do not appear >>corrupted. > > > You've probably done something bad with the perms. Or you installed > cygwin "Just for me", and now you've logged on as a different user.......? > The "file not found" error message can often be a result of an application > not realising that the file is there but the user doesn't have access > rights. > > >>Also, I now notice that other files - filenames that don't conform to >>DOS 8.3 format - also are listable but not editable. I have a source >>file "main.cas", which I can edit. I cp'd it to >>"main_inst.cas", which >>is listable with ls. But when I try to vi it, I get a new >>file. mv'ing >>it to maininst.cas renders it editable. > > > Strange. Still, there's not a lot of point reporting bugs in such an old > version of cygwin. I can't reproduce anything like that with the current > version. > > cheers, > DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/