Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:23:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Soeren Nils Kuklau cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Distributing Cygwin-based software In-Reply-To: <4170586B.9020901@mystfans.com> Message-ID: References: <416ED440 DOT 4000309 AT chucker DOT rasdi DOT net> <41705111 DOT 5040604 AT mystfans DOT com> <4170586B DOT 9020901 AT mystfans DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Soeren Nils Kuklau wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Soeren Nils Kuklau wrote: > > > > > [ sha1 call doesn't link ] > > > > Try linking it with -lcrypto? ;-) I'm surprised it works on OS/X, though. > > LDFLAGS = -lpthread -lcrypto > > We do. ;-) No, you don't. You need LDLIBS = -lpthread -lcrypto Also, FYI, -lpthread is a no-op on Cygwin. > > This is *not* the right list for discussing how to subvert the existing > > > > Cygwin installations on users' machines by distributing your own copy of > > cygwin1.dll (though this *has* been discussed in the past - search the > > list archives). > > Okay, but what /would/ be the right place? Since I don't think people > will be willing to install Cygwin just for being able to use a single > other piece of software... So try MinGW... > Think Gtk for Windows programs (such as Gaim): they come with the proper > frameworks included, so the user won't have to worry about that. So try MinGW... See also ... :-) > > Cygwin is an emulation layer. The Cygwin distribution contains a set > > of packages that use this emulation layer. > > Exactly - but where to discuss projects that use the emulation layer and > aren't part of the distribution (thought they might eventually be)? On the mailing lists devoted to such projects. Or, you can ITP your project for inclusion into Cygwin on the cygwin-apps list -- see . > > > At the same time, however, we do not want Windows-based users to > > > feel forced into Cygwin's behaviours. We want to distribute a > > > Windows application - GPL'd, with some Unix-style quirks, and > > > compatible to the other major OS'es out there, but Windows > > > nevertheless. > > > > So maybe the MinGW project is more like what you're looking for, then. > > Indeed; we're looking into it. Be aware, though, that you won't get full POSIX functionality that Cygwin provides -- only those parts that are directly supported by the MSVC runtime. In particular, you'll lose the ability to understand POSIX (Cygwin) filenames. > > > Those who truly want a full Unix experience wouldn't use Windows in > > > the first place, and thus not Cygwin either. > > > > This is not true at all (to put it mildly). Those who want POSIX behavior > > on Windows *will* (and *do*) use Cygwin. But this particular point is > > better ed. > > Right, but I wouldn't define "POSIX behaviour" as "full Unix experience" ;-) Hey, we're getting there -- see the efforts on porting Gnome to Cygwin... > But yes, that's OT. Yep. A perfect topic for the cygwin-talk list... ;-) HTH, Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing whatever you think is worth doing." -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/