Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <41655E51.4040005@x-ray.at> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:18:41 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin Subject: qmail, DJB licensing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now? Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's. (i.e. people tend to like it more) E.g. sourceware uses qmail http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software I see in the thread around http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01651.html, that qmail has no acceptable license to include it into cygwin, because it cannot be guaranteed that it will work reliably on that "crappy platform" (simplified). Maybe just with dropping vpopmail support. Still the last word? Maybe provide a source package only? Igor suggested such a trick, but then the thread drifted into something completely different. (RPM support, ant, ...) Sergey's original porting thread http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01593.html also drifted into something completely different. (mysql server) Still waiting on DJB's approval? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/