Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:05:58 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery Message-ID: <20041006120558.GA5605@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <42404 DOT 193 DOT 16 DOT 155 DOT 145 DOT 1096475468 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT kainz DOT com> <20040930153543 DOT GC29206 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20040930161545 DOT GC26915 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20041006101749 DOT GW6702 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Oct 6 13:52, Rainer Hochreiter wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:17:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Erm?!? Of course you should write directly to the registry. That's how > > writing the description field is implemented to stay NT4 compatible. So > > just copy the behaviour for writing the actions parameter. > > but who guarantees that writing directly to the registry will be > compliant to upcoming windows version? Nobody. But in that case we change cygrunsrv to write the parameters differently into the registry if newer NT versions require that, no? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/