Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4162F2EB.4020408@x-ray.at> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:15:55 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Absence of mkgroup and mkpasswd man pages References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Dave Korn schrieb: > I'd go so far as to say that the docs should not only be a default package, it > should be a compulsory package that can't be uninstalled, only updated. Or > perhaps it should just rolled into the cygwin base package. Whatever, there's no > good reason to allow people to install an un-documented cygwin, they'll only end > up coming here with questions they would have known the answers to if they'd had > the docs. Agreed. BTW: What about a man page for dllwrap? It's a binutils binary, without any info nor man nor description in the Cygwin/*.README. I would want to write one, if I would understand it. But then I wouldn't need it. (Catch 22) I don't think that binutils wants to support it in their texinfo doc. But please someone (Charles?) add some info either to cygwin-doc or binutils. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/