Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:21:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04E99@exchange.timesys.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robb, Sam" To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i94IQFg0008919 > It would seem that bin #1 is consuming the majority of the effort. I > think that by changing priorities and re-allocating people and > resources, it should be possible to create integration tests and a > "stable" distribution. Such would increase Cygwin's acceptance and > usage for potentially hundreds of millions of people. Is this not a > good thing? Speaking for myself, as one of the package maintainers: I'm not open to, nor willing to be, "re-allocated". I *volunteered* as a package maintainer in order to fill a particular position in the Cygwin ecosystem. I will continue to fill that position for so long as it is interesting and fun for me to do so. Someone trying to "re-allocate" me would immediately make the position non-interesting, not-fun, and result in my volunteering my time elsewhere. -Samrobb -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/