Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <416023B6.1050805@x-ray.at> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:07:18 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Gary R. Van Sickle schrieb: > It would increase the amount of work application developers (assuming you > mean package maintainers) would have to do. More work for no pay has never > been welcomed by anybody in the history of the world. Well, they only good reason to start such a project would be monetary benefits. Besides the simplification of having a (stable) cygwin snapshot release from time to time, where all packages play well together. And I don't see any problems to charge money for such distributions, as long as the GPL and sourceware's additional restrictions (?) are honored. Like every linux distributor makes money from selling CD's and charging for support. As long as on a server (publicly) the snapshot ("release") is also provided. -- Reini -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/