Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <23bcb87004092407504253ce0f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:50:02 -0400
From: Doctor Bill <docbill AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: Doctor Bill <docbill AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: File permission problem
In-Reply-To: <cj1boc$dv4$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6334E09627481B4AA5C8DE1E69E19D3B013BA6ED AT SSLEXCHANGE DOT solomonsystech DOT com> <4153DE28 DOT EA0B2556 AT dessent DOT net> <20040924091513 DOT GX12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <4153EAB1 DOT DF553825 AT dessent DOT net> <20040924094839 DOT GZ12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <cj1boc$dv4$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Does smbntsec work if the file system is shared from a Win9x machine? 
If so, where are the NT ACL's stored?

                                        Bill


On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:05 -0700, Andrew DeFaria <andrew AT defaria DOT com> wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 24 02:36, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> jackylam AT solomon-systech DOT com wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
> >>>> token, or for some strange reason you have nosmbntsec set. RTFM:
> >>>> <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html>
> >>>
> >>> nosmbntsec is default.
> >>
> >> If this is true then the docs need to be updated, or at least clarified.
> >>
> >> "(no)smbntsec - if set, use ntsec on remote drives as well (this is the
> >> default)."
> >
> >
> > Urgh. This is how I intended to implement it when I did ... three
> > years ago? Dunno anymore, but nosmbntsec is default already for ages.
> >
> > I've changed the documentation.
> 
> I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and
> smbntsec off by default?
> --
> The Definition of an Upgrade: Take old bugs out, put new ones in.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/