Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject: Re: File permission problem
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:05 -0700
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <cj1boc$dv4$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <6334E09627481B4AA5C8DE1E69E19D3B013BA6ED AT SSLEXCHANGE DOT solomonsystech DOT com> <4153DE28 DOT EA0B2556 AT dessent DOT net> <20040924091513 DOT GX12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <4153EAB1 DOT DF553825 AT dessent DOT net> <20040924094839 DOT GZ12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h-67-102-25-114.lsanca54.covad.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
In-Reply-To: <20040924094839.GZ12802@cygbert.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Sep 24 02:36, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 24 01:43, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>>
>>>> jackylam AT solomon-systech DOT com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, it is an NTFS on a network drive. Is it related?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. You probably lack the SeRestorePrivilege right on your login
>>>> token, or for some strange reason you have nosmbntsec set. RTFM:
>>>> <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html>
>>>
>>> nosmbntsec is default.
>>
>> If this is true then the docs need to be updated, or at least clarified.
>>
>> "(no)smbntsec - if set, use ntsec on remote drives as well (this is the
>> default)."
>
>
> Urgh. This is how I intended to implement it when I did ... three
> years ago? Dunno anymore, but nosmbntsec is default already for ages.
>
> I've changed the documentation.

I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and 
smbntsec off by default?
-- 
The Definition of an Upgrade: Take old bugs out, put new ones in.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/