Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <41535FDE.4593E42E@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:44:30 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" Subject: Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR, it really works. References: <307588049 DOT 20040923202318 AT familiehaase DOT de> <1212429650 DOT 20040924011832 AT familiehaase DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > >> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm > >> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with > >> filtering. > > > Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL > > database as well as bouncing most of them on my little 333 Mhz Linux box > > without the CPU dropping below 90% idle. > > I really should install another system... which database are you > using? Which program? I'm interested to do the same, but I have not > found the all in one solution yet, there is dbmail, but it doesn't > work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet. I run spamassassin and clamav during the SMTP DATA phase, thanks to the exiscan-acl patch (which is included in the exim4-daemon-heavy Debian package) for every incoming message. This is on a very modest server with only 64MB of RAM - a VDS using usermode linux. I find that most messages take less than 5 seconds to process, with most taking 1-3 seconds. Even if each one took 5 seconds, that would still be a throughput of more than 17k messages per day. The advantage of doing it this way is that I can reject spam and malware at SMTP time, with no possibility of generating a bogus non-deliverable bounce that will just clog up some innocent's inbox. While the hard-core spammers aren't phased by the SMTP 5xx reject, some spamware used by the more grey-hat organizations will actually take note that the message was rejected and not attempt a retry - which at least saves a little bit of future bandwidth. I have a two-level threshold system, anything that scores above 12.0 spamassassin points gets rejected outright after the SMTP DATA command, and anything higher than 5.0 gets the "X-Spam-Flag: YES" header inserted for easy filtering by my mail application into the spam folder. I'm very pleased with the results. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/