Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:20:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Message-ID: <20040923172006.GB19595@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1095957197 DOT 9615 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <41530001 DOT 8080504 AT veritech DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41530001.8080504@veritech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:55:29PM -0400, LDR wrote: >I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format. > >The email addresses are preserved in these. > >Isn't this unnecessary exposure? > >Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting >new addresses from each new digest? The spammer could just subscribe to the regular mailing list if they wanted to see email addresses. I don't see how the digest is any more or less exposure. -- Christopher Faylor spammer? -> aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org Cygwin Co-Project Leader aaaspam AT duffek DOT com TimeSys, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/