Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:53:12 -0500 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Andreas Petralia cc: Cygwin List Subject: Re: multi-user environment: mounting a lot of shares via ssh In-Reply-To: <415034C8.B597FF38@adnovum.ch> Message-ID: References: <41502E44 DOT 8CAE54F0 AT adnovum DOT ch> <6 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20040921093736 DOT 03d5bae0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <415034C8 DOT B597FF38 AT adnovum DOT ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Andreas Petralia wrote: > > Why not use the UNC path directly instead? > > because of the following reasons: > > 1. > > i want to make the home-directories available in the directory /HOMES: > /HOMES/A, /HOMES/B, /HOMES/C, ... > and i think it's not possible to link to a UNC path (eg. ln -s > /HOMES/A) is it? It is possible. > 2. not every binary (tool) can handle UNC-paths Agreed :-(, but those tools are arguably broken. > 3. i would like to set up an environment, where *unix*-scripts+tools do > not have to know anything about UNC_paths. Why would they? And, as suggested in a later reply, use mount. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/