Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <414EFAE7.5070708@kaffe.org> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:44:39 +0200 From: Dalibor Topic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" CC: "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" Subject: Re: Cygwin-specific Libtool patches References: <20040906021844 DOT 84591 DOT qmail AT web53304 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1095382062 DOT 1234 DOT 164 DOT camel AT gadek DOT homelinux DOT org> <1729140505 DOT 20040917144223 AT familiehaase DOT de> <1095453892 DOT 21655 DOT 265 DOT camel AT glue> <1902690 DOT 20040918145110 AT familiehaase DOT de> <414EAA70 DOT 2090700 AT kaffe DOT org> <122925117 DOT 20040920155923 AT familiehaase DOT de> In-Reply-To: <122925117.20040920155923@familiehaase.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo Dalibor, > > Am Montag, 20. September 2004 um 12:01 schriebst du: > > >>I was wondering whether you know if there are pending patches from >>Cygwin developers for GNU Libtool, as they are preparing Libtool 2.0, so >>it would be nice to have those included, if possible :) The Libtool >>upstream is very cooperative and responsive to patches in my experience. > > > If our libtool maintainer and his family survived Ivan I'm pretty sure > that he will submit pending patches timely. Thanks for the quick reply, Gerrit, and for putting things in perspective. I hope all are well. cheers, dalibor topic -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/