Message-Id: <200409110313.i8B3DkJG022240@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: What Cygwin is
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:13:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0409091257430.2916@fordpc.vss.fsi.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Sep  8 11:31, Brian Ford wrote:
> > > No, now we continually have to explain why you can't install said
> > > x86 Linux binary/package and run it under our Linux 
> emulator.  Heck, 
> > > you can't even *compile* said Linux firewall/router/proxy server 
> > > etc. under our Linux emulator.  Doesn't sound like much 
> of an emulation to me.
> >
> > You don't think that's the fault of our project page, do 
> you?  Did you 
> > read it lately?  For about three months, there's a pretty 
> precise text 
> > with the headline "What Isn't Cygwin?"
> 
> Sorry, no; I had not read it within that time period.  I was 
> going on recollection; my bad.  It is much better now.
> 
> However, if Cygwin is "a Linux emulation layer providing 
> substantial Linux API functionality", then shouldn't Linux 
> APIs and behavior now trump POSIX and the Single Unix 
> Specification?  Is that what we really want?
>

No.
 
> I'm just not comfortable with the removal of all all 
> references to POSIX and UNIX from that description.
> 

Nor I, nor apparently many others, especially when the replacement is simply
not correct.  And anyway, if it's going to be a "Linux emulation layer", it
better be changed to "GNU/Linux emulation layer" or Stallman will throw a
hissy fit.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/