Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject: Re: Is it free to use
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:10:33 -0700
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <chprpi$ul9$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <OF6CBC2D37 DOT 10E924C4-ON48256F0A DOT 00203BCE AT TMHK> <414007D6 DOT 7DB36622 AT dessent DOT net> <20040909135502 DOT GC27325 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h-67-102-25-114.lsanca54.covad.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7+ (Windows/20040827)
In-Reply-To: <20040909135502.GC27325@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> This means that if you are developing software for eventual release, 
> you must also make the source code available when you make binaries 
> available.

If I develop an app and do not wish to have a requirement to install 
Cygwin I would use MingW, right? In that case is my app still under GPL 
just because I used Cygwin's gcc to compile and link the resulting 
executable that will have no more dependencies on Cygwin? (Just curious).

-- 
Happiness is merely the remission of pain.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/