Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:50:35 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [OT] RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated cygwin Package: procmail-3.22-10
Message-ID: <20040909085035.GD2953@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <NUTMEGRKLpgTFur2iz20000122c AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0409081052370 DOT 2916 AT fordpc DOT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0409081052370.2916@fordpc.vss.fsi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Sep  8 11:31, Brian Ford wrote:
> No, now we continually have to explain why you can't install said
> x86 Linux binary/package and run it under our Linux emulator.  Heck, you
> can't even *compile* said Linux firewall/router/proxy server etc. under
> our Linux emulator.  Doesn't sound like much of an emulation to me.

You don't think that's the fault of our project page, do you?  Did you
read it lately?  For about three months, there's a pretty precise text
with the headline "What Isn't Cygwin?"


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/