Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-BigFish: VP Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:52:31 -0600 From: Isaac Foraker Subject: Re: 1.5.11: execvp bug (XP) In-reply-to: To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <413F38CF.1010705@xilinx.com> Organization: Xilinx, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) References: <413E410F DOT 5010901 AT xilinx DOT com> <413E4760 DOT 8060509 AT xilinx DOT com> <413E8B44 DOT 9080706 AT xilinx DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Okay, this is interesting. I got rid of /usr/bin/perl, and copied perl5.8.5.exe back to perl.exe. Then I tried the exact sequence you had below and it worked. For some reason the /usr/bin/perl1 soft link works but the /usr/bin/perl soft link does not. I'm at a loss. Why can't I make /usr/bin/perl a soft link to /usr/bin/perl5.8.5? Why does this only seem to affect certain systems? Thanks, IF Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >Well, I have XP SP1, and, as you saw, it worked. Since I didn't *really* >try it with 1.5.11, but rather with a self-built DLL from CVS, you might >try the latest snapshot and see if that fixes your problem. Otherwise, I >had a WAG that it had to do with the presence of .exe in the symlink name >and contents, but the guess didn't pan out for me -- it worked in all 4 >combinations. > >I don't believe you ever said whether the *exact* sequence of commands >below worked for you or not. > >Ah, another possibly relevant point: I use perl 5.8.2-1... Could you >please try that? > Igor > >On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Isaac Foraker wrote: > > > >>#uname -a >>CYGWIN_NT-5.1 xcoisaacf20 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) 2004-09-04 23:17 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin >> >>I tried this same experiment on a home PC, and it is not having the >>problem. The major difference I can see is that the home PC has XP SP2 >>installed, and the work machine is still on Service Pack 1 (I have no >>control over that). I'm trying to identify anything else different on >>the work machine that could cause 1.5.11 to not work. I'm not having any >>trouble with 1.5.10, so my group is sticking with that for now. >> >>Thanks, >>IF >> >>Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >> >> >>>Sorry, missed that. Still, like CGF, I can't reproduce this: >>> >>>$ echo -e 'default:\n\tperl1 foo.pl' > Makefile >>>$ echo -e '#!/usr/bin/perl1\n\n\nprint "Success.\\n"' > foo.pl >>>$ ln -fs /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl1 >>>$ make >>>perl1 foo.pl >>>Success. >>>$ uname -a >>>CYGWIN_NT-5.1 pechtcha 1.5.12(0.116/4/2) 2004-09-07 15:07 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin >>>$ >>> >>>There must be something peculiar to your installation. Does the exact >>>recipe above work for you? >>> >>> -- Isaac W. Foraker Sr. Software Engineer, Xilinx, Longmont, CO 720.652.3918 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/