Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:47:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Carlo Florendo cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why is there a ZZZRemovedpackages? In-Reply-To: <41381F93.90401@hq.astra.ph> Message-ID: References: <41381F93 DOT 90401 AT hq DOT astra DOT ph> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Carlo Florendo wrote: > Hello, > > I'm actually not encountering any problem with cygwin now. It has > actually been performing impressively! Thanks to all you cygwin people. That's good to know. > In any case, we keep a mirror of the cygwin releases and I was just > curious why there is a ZZZRemovedpackages directory under /release. > What's it for? Is it ok if I remove it completely from oour local mirror > site? I believe the category was created by Harold Hunt for the XFree86 upgrade helpers when Cygwin/X switched to the X.org source base. The name of the category was supposed to imply that the packages should not be installed on a fresh install. The packages in that category are all very small, though (about .5k per directory), and installing them should be harmless. You can go either way. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing whatever you think is worth doing." -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/