Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:14:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygrunsrv xinetd problem In-Reply-To: <4132250E.C3006DFD@dessent.net> Message-ID: References: <001501c48db4$059224f0$3601010a AT plas> <002801c48dd2$8a76b320$3601010a AT plas> <4132250E DOT C3006DFD AT dessent DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Brian Dessent wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > > Nastepujace informacje sa czescia zdarzenia: xinetd : PID 3680 : > > > starting service `xinetd' failed: execv: 1, Operation not permitted." > > > > This, however, says: > > > > "The following information is part of the event: xinetd : PID 3680 : > > starting service `xinetd' failed: execv: 1, Operation not permitted." > > > > Which is the actual message from xinetd, and is *very* helpful. This > > basically says that the service manager couldn't execute the xinetd > > program when running as SYSTEM. Check the permissions on both > > /usr/sbin/xinetd and /bin/cygwin1.dll (and whatever other DLLs the xinetd > > program depends on -- see the output of "cygcheck /usr/sbin/xinetd.exe"). > > Make sure all of them are executable by SYSTEM. > > The OP also mentioned the common line, "but I ran it as a normal user > and it started fine." There should be a big "NO! don't do this!" > somewhere in the Users Guide about testing a service by running it from > your regular user account. Doing so can create log, pid, etc. files > with the wrong ownership and permissions, so that when you later run it > as SYSTEM it fails because it cannot write or delete those files. It's > always helpful to nuke all traces of these kinds of files when trying to > get a service to start that is erroring. Very true. And you're right that the User's Guide probably should have some words to that effect. If one needs to test the service by running the executable directly, it's probably best to do that from a SYSTEM-owned shell (see the recent thread: ). > In this particular case it's probably not the problem because the error > would likely be "Permission denied" and not "Operation not permitted", > and so Igor's advise about checking for +x is probably right. But I > thought I'd mention it as I've seen this bite people many times. > > Brian Good point. Again, this probably belongs in the User's Guide or the FAQ -- that, and the bit about deleting the log files after testing services as normal users. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing whatever you think is worth doing." -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/