Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:45:30 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Release candidate: gcc-3.4.1-1
Message-ID: <20040828214530.GA31976@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <05d701c48ace$cddbb2c0$0e00a8c0 AT duli2> <961849581086 DOT 20040825202831 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <961849581086.20040825202831@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:28:31PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Krzysztof schrieb:
>
>> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>>> > Is this true? I have 3.3.1 libraries in /lib and
>>> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1, but 2.95 libraries only in
>>> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10.
>>>
>>> There was no libjava with 2.x compilers.  There was no libobjc with 2.x
>>> compilers.  What about libstdc++?
>
>> As I said, 2.95 holds all its libraries, including libstdc++, in
>> /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10.
>
>Interesting, I would be interested why the previous maintainer switched
>to unversioned runtime libs.

The usual reason.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/