Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:07:51 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: OpenSSH-3.9p1-1, mysterious -r option, and documented steps to resolve "Connection to host closed." message was sshd privilege separation problem Message-ID: <20040828150751.GA27978@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <412EAB86 DOT 1060709 AT cox DOT net> <41301832 DOT 70404 AT cox DOT net> <20040828090803 DOT GC4786 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <41308503 DOT 7080001 AT x-ray DOT at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41308503.7080001@x-ray.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Aug 28 15:13, Reini Urban wrote: > Corinna Vinschen schrieb: > >On Aug 27 22:29, Greg Morgan wrote: > >>More on why I selected "tty ntsec" > >>http://tech.erdelynet.com/cygwin-sshd.html. It has always worked. > > > >These are useless. Since ssh sessions are running in a pty, they are > >in "tty" mode anyway, "ntsec" is on by default. > > just "ntea" should be turned on (unless its win95), because it should be NOOOO! ntea is old crap and has *nothing* to do with real security. It's just plain fake. It's not even used if ntsec is in use, only if ntsec is explicitely switched off. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/