Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:26:48 +0200 From: Giulio Ardoino To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: License In-Reply-To: References: <20040826165355 DOT 70E5 DOT GIULIASTRO AT tin DOT it> Message-Id: <20040826172427.70EC.GIULIASTRO@tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > IANAL, but the GPL does talk about linking as separate from invoking the > programs using fork/exec. In particular, the following two sections from > the GPL FAQ might be relevant: > and > . They seem pretty clear, I'd be using an "exec" to invoke those GPL tools and not dynamically call their functions. Thanks, G -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/